The State Backward Classes Commission is listening to the guarantees associated to the safeguards and oppression of the Other Backward Classes.

Continuous listening to is being held by the Uttar Pradesh State Backward Classes Commission within the workplace of the State Backward Classes Commission situated at Indira Bhawan for the aim of offering justice to the oppressed and oppressed group of the backward courses of the state. To obtain this goal, 32 sorts of instances associated to safeguards and oppression of backward class individuals of various districts of the state had been heard by the Chairman of State Backward Classes Commission, Mr. Jaswant Saini final day and directions got to take motion on essential issues. .
In the fee, Mr. Nirendra Singh Rathore, District Convenor, Bareilly Vs. District Magistrate Bareilly, who’s the present Municipality President of Nagar Palika Parishad Nawabganj Bareilly, Mrs. Shahila Tahir made a pretend certificates of the backward caste and contested the election from the seat of the municipal president reserved for the backward. The grievance was obtained on 15 October 2019 relating to the violation of rights of A committee was constituted by the District Magistrate Bareilly on the matter and after the choice of the District Level Caste Certificate Verification Committee, the Tehsildar Nabavganj Bareilly canceled the caste certificates for backward castes of Uttar Pradesh issued in favor of Smt. Shehla Tahir on January 21, 2017. Gaya. This proof was offered earlier than the fee by the consultant of District Magistrate Bareilly on the time of listening to. The fee mentioned that motion can be taken to register an FIR in opposition to the Municipality President and the involved officers/staff for making and making pretend caste certificates.
Similarly, the case of Shri Neeraj Kumar Rajput vs Principal Secretary Housing, UP Government and Vice President Lucknow Development Authority, Lucknow, which was associated to offering plot, was heard. The fee expressed displeasure over the absence of any consultant on behalf of the principal secretary. The fee mentioned that a variety of complaints are being obtained by Lucknow Development Authority relating to irregularities within the plots of backward courses which is regrettable. Shri Saini mentioned that Principal Secretary Housing, Uttar Pradesh Government and Vice-Chairman Lucknow Development Authority ought to take the complaints of backward courses severely and resolve them promptly.
The case of Shri Kanhai, Cleaner, District Unnao Vs. Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow was heard by the fee, during which all of the pending payments had been paid by the division.

Like this:

Like Loading…

Continue Reading