The Guardian portrays Gurgaon’s public parks as ‘Muslim spaces’ and claims Muslims have nowhere to hope

As Britain is getting Islamised at a speedy tempo, the sympathy for radicals retains rising within the nation. In one such occasion of clear pro-radical bias, The Guardian, a London-based newspaper has dishonestly reported on the passive land Jihad in Gurgaon and tried to painting town’s public parks as ‘Muslim spaces’.Unauthentic anti-Hindu article revealed by The Guardian:What appears to be unauthentic, missing in credible analysis, and based mostly on conjecture, The Guardian has reported the current Namaz controversy with the title “New city, old schism: Hindu groups target Gurgaon’s Muslim prayer sites”. The controversial piece is written by Hannah Ellis-Peterson with the enter of a sure Vandana Ok. Twitter bio of Vandana claims that she is an unbiased journalist, whereas Hannah is the South Asia head of the newspaper who believes in hedonism (looking for impulsive pleasure).The author has cleverly set the tone of the passage as Muslim victimisation by establishing within the title itself that Muslim prayer websites are focused by Hindus. The reality is that these are parks, and all parks, generally, are public locations, and each particular person citizen of India, whether or not they’re Hindu, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Man, or girl have a proper to go to that place. This is just about the definition of a public place, and it’s absurd to say it as a Muslim prayer website. Muslim prayer websites are referred to as mosques and never public parks.Read extra: ‘Don’t come to supply Namaz subsequent time,’ Gurgaon villagers inform IslamistsHindus’ unity is termed as a Mob:For its gullible elite readers, the writer then went on to determine one other declare that individuals opposing the passive land-Jihad are Hindu-nationalist mob. A mob actually interprets to a disordered gathering which takes regulation and order into their very own palms. However, in actuality, the Hindus who had gathered there to free Public Park from Islamists took the authorized pathway and sought the assist of the administration in liberating up the general public park. Yet once more, the writer’s bias stands debunked.Muslims are proven as victims:Hannah then proceeds to say that Muslim labourers who have been employed by the Gurgaon administration are denied their primary proper to supply prayers. Like all different false claims, that is additionally not grounded in actuality. A Muslim can provide prayer both alone or with a gaggle of individuals at anyplace. It is absurd that they’re selecting to hope in a gaggle of lots of after which demand land from public authorities to supply Namaz. It finally ends up disrupting the traditional lifetime of a commoner. Surely, they do their very own Namaz, however they can’t infringe on others’ rights.Read extra: Namaz on roads: Gurgaon villagers protest towards NDTV over its protectionHindus are aggressors whereas Muslims are peaceable in response to Hannah:Similarly, the Gurgaon administration’s efforts to scale back the burden of commoners by reducing the numbers of legally accepted Namaz websites have been termed as ‘bowing to the demand of fanatics’ by the writer. She then went on to say that Hindus have been demanding to shoot the traitors (Muslims on this case). It is pertinent that these sorts of slogans are primarily raised in establishments like JNU, a harking back to leftist bastion; towards Indian forces preventing the enemies. Rarely will you discover any Indian citizen utilizing this slogan on a street.Read extra: Gurugram Police’s stunning defence after a Muslim group performs Namaz in a public placeThe Guardian stoops to defaming Hindus:In the following a part of her piece, Hannah strides on defaming the folks protesting for Hindus’ rights in public locations in Gurgaon. Claiming that Dinesh Thakur, one of many protestors ran aggressively in direction of a Muslim to cease him from doing Namaz she wrote that Muslims have been silent and have been simply busy bowing down their heads for Namaz. It is a intelligent try to color Hindus in a nasty mild whereas making readers sympathise with the Muslim mob.Read extra: Elderly folks oppose Namaz in Gurgaon society’s public space. Media calls it “communal”Tried to mission a ‘Sikh-Islamist unity’ towards Hindus:At the tip of the write-up, Hannah goes on to speak about Gurudwaras providing a spot of worship to Namazis. She writes that Gurdwaras stepped in to help Muslims, however they have been additionally met with the calls of disbanding them. Historically, Islamists have been brutal towards Sikhs, and so they had killed the ninth Sikh guru. Citing Daya Singh, a member of the Gurudwara Shri Guru Singh Sabha committee, Petersen claims that Hindus utilizing public locations hijacked by Islamists is an try to alienate Muslims from society.Read extra: ‘Gurudwara is for Gurbani only,’ Gurugram Gurudwara does a U-turn on Namaz invitationWith a historical past of anti-Modi, anti-Hindu and anti-India biased behind it, Indians, particularly Hindus don’t count on any higher therapy from The Guardian. But it was the peak of absurd Islamic appeasement to attempt to create a sympathy wave for Islamists infringing on the person rights of Hindus.