What BBC’s protection of Pakistan says: West just isn’t the hero in Afghanistan

An fascinating occasion transpired on the British Broadcasting Service (BBC) on Sunday. A famous tutorial was minimize off by the anchor of the channel when she elaborated on the help Pakistan supplied to the Taliban of their struggle in opposition to the USA and the west-backed Government in Afghanistan.
Christina Fair was shut down as a result of it could in some way violate the channel’s “impartiality” doctrine as there was no Pakistani diplomat on the present to supply a response. But it’s an open secret that the Taliban has been receiving assist from the Pakistani Government.
The Taliban acknowledges the help and calls Pakistan their second dwelling. Pakistani Ministers, too, have been celebrating their victory in Afghanistan. It is unclear how elaborating the identical would violate coverage in any method.
But the incident completely highlights one thing that now we have at all times recognized: The West just isn’t the hero in Afghanistan. It beggars perception that the United States and western nations continued to depend on Pakistan as their trusted ally even because the latter undermined the US-backed authorities in Afghanistan.
On one hand, the West claimed that it was waging struggle in opposition to a medieval military that seeks to impose Shariah regulation within the nation and oppress girls and minorities in Afghanistan. On the opposite hand, they handled as their ally the very nation which was serving to this band of merry Jihadists. How does that work?
Needless to say, one of many major explanation why the western media just isn’t too eager on highlighting the position of Pakistan is as a result of it is going to expose the duplicity of their very own governments. And it’s fairly clear that western nations have nonetheless not learnt something from their errors in Afghanistan.
Only a few days after the Kabul airport assault, United States Senator Lindsey Graham was overtly batting for Pakistan. “Any sustainable solution in Afghanistan must include Pakistan,” the Senator stated solely two days after a terrorist assault prompted the demise of almost 200 individuals, together with American service members.
Source: Twitter
To be honest, the conduct of US forces in Afghanistan has been removed from exemplary. Corruption was so rampant beneath the US-backed authorities that widows of Afghan troopers needed to supply sexual favours to safe the pensions that have been promised to their husbands.
The CIA was going round distributing Viagra to ageing tribal warlords with a purpose to safe their help. As US President Joe Biden would say, “here’s the deal”, if it’s a must to depend on serving to tribal warlords copulate with their 4 wives higher and have as an ally a rustic that’s supporting your arch enemy, then maybe the struggle just isn’t going so nicely.
Apart from all of this, there was the intense matter of the killing of Afghan civilians. From George Bush to Joe Biden, all of the 4 American presidents who’ve presided over the Afghanistan are responsible of killing harmless Afghan kids. It is likely to be a bit tough to win well-liked help as a overseas invading pressure when you find yourself busy bombing hospitals, weddings and killing kids in residential areas.
Even in spite of everything of this, there are expectations from sure quarters that the USA might nonetheless assist the individuals of Afghanistan. It is one thing that US officers have been promising too, that they are going to use diplomatic efforts to construct strain on the Taliban to handle the human rights considerations within the nation.
Such efforts are doomed to fail, particularly as a result of the USA seems determined to type a partnership with the Taliban. The excuse is that the ISKP is a risk to Afghanistan and the world and subsequently, the USA is likely to be inclined to help them.
A partnership between the 2 just isn’t unthinkable, particularly because the USA collaborated with the Taliban throughout the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and even handed out a listing of Americans and Afghan collaborators to the Jihadist outfit.
It is completely according to the USA’s bigger coverage in direction of Jihadist outfits it has described as terrorists in some unspecified time in the future. For occasion, the USA funded Jihadists in opposition to Basshar al-Assad in Syria and armed Al Nusra as nicely. Indeed, there are only a few terrorist teams on the earth the USA has not collaborated with.
The BBC anchor’s present stance in opposition to a tutorial highlighting the position of Pakistan within the Afghan struggle is in nice consonance with western coverage. It is comprehensible that western media doesn’t want for his or her residents to know the truth that their authorities has been actively allying with a state that sponsors terrorism. Under such circumstances, censorship of opinion is the one credible choice.
It can be for a similar purpose that whereas the western media and its academia-NGO nexus lectures others on human rights, they ignore the truth that the USA has been killing Afghan kids at an alarming fee for 20 years. Despite the struggle crimes western forces have dedicated in Afghanistan, their media continued to painting them as heroes and the prince in shining armour out to avoid wasting Afghan girls and kids.
None of that is supposed to absolve the Taliban of its quite a few sins. It is just to put emphasis on the truth that within the Afghan struggle, there have been no heroes, solely monsters of various shades. As Wikileaks founder Julian Assange stated in 2011 in regards to the precise aims of the Afghan War, “The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the US and Europe through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security elite. The goal is an endless war, not a successful war.”