India seeks more durable motion from US tech giants on pretend information

Indian officers have held heated discussions with Google, Twitter and Facebook for not proactively eradicating what they described as pretend information on their platforms, sources informed Reuters, the federal government’s newest altercation with Big Tech. The officers, from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B), strongly criticised the businesses and mentioned their inaction on pretend information was forcing the Indian authorities to order content material takedowns, which in flip drew worldwide criticism that authorities had been suppressing free expression, two sources mentioned.
The sources, who had been acquainted with the proceedings on the digital assembly on Monday, described the dialog as tense and heated, signalling a brand new low in ties between American tech giants and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration. The officers didn’t problem any ultimatum to the businesses on the assembly, the sources mentioned. The authorities has been tightening tech sector rules however desires firms to do extra on content material moderation.
The assembly was a follow-up to the I&B ministry’s use of “emergency powers” in December and January to order the blocking of 55 channels on Google’s YouTube platform, and a few Twitter and Facebook accounts The authorities had mentioned the channels had been selling “fake news” or “anti-India” content material and that the disinformation was being unfold by accounts based mostly in neighbouring Pakistan.

The I&B ministry didn’t reply to a request for touch upon the assembly, which was additionally attended by Indian content-sharing platforms ShareChat and Koo, which have tens of millions of customers within the nation. Facebook, now often known as Meta, Twitter and ShareChat declined remark.
Without commenting on the assembly, Alphabet Inc’s Google mentioned in a press release it evaluations authorities’s requests and “where appropriate, we restrict or remove content in keeping with local laws.” Koo mentioned it complies with native legal guidelines and has robust content material moderation practices in place.
In its transparency stories, Twitter has mentioned the Indian authorities makes among the many highest variety of requests to take away content material from its platform. Technology web site Comparitech in October mentioned India made 97,631 content material removing requests in 2020, the second-highest on the earth after Russia, principally to Facebook and Google.
Strained ties
During the assembly, senior tech executives informed the officers that they take enough measures to take away or curb the unfold of misinformation on their platforms, and act on legally-valid content material removing requests, mentioned the sources. The officers informed Google to evaluate its inside tips to take away pretend content material mechanically, mentioned the sources.
The officers additionally mentioned the federal government was disenchanted that large social media platforms, together with Facebook and Twitter, weren’t detecting and eradicating such content material on their very own. Instead, the federal government was pressured to order takedowns, opening it to criticism and damaging its public picture, the officers mentioned through the assembly, in accordance with the sources.
Executives from Google informed the I&B officers that one approach to resolve that was for the ministry to keep away from making takedown selections public. The companies might work with the federal government and act on the alleged pretend content material, which might be a win-win for each side, Google mentioned, in accordance with one of many sources.

The concept was summarily rejected by the federal government officers, who mentioned the takedowns additionally publicise how the businesses weren’t doing sufficient to deal with pretend information on their very own, the particular person mentioned.
While ordering takedowns of sure on-line accounts in January, the federal government mentioned it was doing so to “secure the overall information environment in India”, including that such pretend content material was on “sensitive subjects” such because the Indian Army, India’s international relations and native state elections.
Digital rights advocates say such authorities orders curb free speech and set a worrying precedent. “Detailed takedown orders are not made public by the government,” mentioned Apar Gupta, the manager director at Internet Freedom Foundation, including that the premise for the motion was not defined.
This allowed authorities to censor content material even when it doesn’t violate public order or the safety of the state, he mentioned.