Unnao News: Scam in Prime Minister’s home allocation in Unnao, Village Development Officer suspended

In Unnao, Uttar Pradesh, the Village Development Officer was suspended for disturbing the Prime Minister’s residence. The allegations made within the investigation on the grievance letter of the BJYMO District Vice President had been discovered to be true. At the identical time, the village improvement officer informed that false allegations have been made to tarnish his social fame. The division has convicted him with out conducting a full investigation. He will go to the courtroom. The Prime Minister’s residence was allotted on the ID of Shivraj Pasi, a resident of Nathi Kheda village of Purva Vikas. Vinod Kumar Sharma, District Vice President of BJYM stated that in 2017-18, the good thing about the home allotted in Shivraj’s ID was given to Motilal, a resident of the village, whereas Motilal had already bought the good thing about housing. The then Village Development Officer, Puttan Lal Pal, siphoned off the allotted funds connected to the headquarters. On the grievance letter, the DM handed over the investigation to the Block Development Officer Purva Dharmendra Singh. The investigation report discovered the matter to be true. The DM directed the CDO that Puttan Lal Pal needs to be suspended. Acting on the letter, the District Development Officer suspended Puttan Lal Pal and connected it to the headquarters. In this regard, Puttan Lal Pal stated that the Block Development Officer, impressed by the spirit of revenge, had wrongly accused him. Report has been despatched. Being the president of the Village Development Officers’ Association, he had staged a sit-in protest within the improvement block premises on February final towards the black deeds of the Block Development Officer who was consuming alcohol. With which he thought-about indignant. Unnao News: 1 policeman arrested for the homicide of a young person promoting greens in Unnao, Kotwal line current, he had demanded a good investigation by giving a letter to the CDO. On the directions of the CDO, the District Development Officer had requested for the registration type and demand type of the beneficiaries involved for investigation of the case, however on May 29, the District Development Officer was informed that the information weren’t being searched within the block. He requested how he was proved responsible with out checking the information. The investigation report of the Block Development Officer has been referred to as false. .