Kerala HC permits 9 vice chancellors to proceed until November 3
3 min readBy Express News Service
KOCHI: The Kerala High Court on Monday held that the vice chancellors of 9 universities who had been directed to tender resignation by Governor Arif Mohammad Khan can proceed of their positions till the Governor points a last order.
The Governor has issued a present trigger discover to the vice chancellors they usually have been given time until November 3 to submit their arguments. The vice chancellors will probably be eligible to proceed of their positions in full compliance with regulation and rules until the chancellor points a last order, held Justice Devan Ramachandran who held a particular sitting to listen to the case at 4 pm on Monday.
The vice chancellors had approached the courtroom alleging that the Governor who can be the chancellor of universities directed them to resign with out following the process. The Governor directed the VCs to resign within the backdrop of the Supreme Court order settings apart the appointment of Kerala Technological University vice chancellor because the UGC rules weren’t adopted.
The petitioners asserted that the communication from the Governor was unlawful, incompetent and past the jurisdiction of the Governor. They argued that the Supreme Court order within the case of Kerala Technological University has no bearing on them. The counsel for the petitioners the Governor thrust his choice on them with out giving a chance to current their view.
They contended that the motion of Chancellor is in flagrant violation of ideas of honest play and pure justice.
The petitioners argued that the judgement referred to by the chancellor within the impugned communication couldn’t apply to petitioners as SC had delivered the judgement contemplating the 2010 UGC rules, whereas they had been appointed underneath 2018 rules.
The counsel for the chancellor argued that the communication to VCs was issued in good religion and with the intent to inform that their appointments had been unlawful. To save them the ignominy they got the choice for honourable exit.
The Governor acted in good religion as he’s absolutely conscious that each one are working for similar system. The chancellor had no possibility however to behave within the mild of SC judgements
KOCHI: The Kerala High Court on Monday held that the vice chancellors of 9 universities who had been directed to tender resignation by Governor Arif Mohammad Khan can proceed of their positions till the Governor points a last order.
The Governor has issued a present trigger discover to the vice chancellors they usually have been given time until November 3 to submit their arguments. The vice chancellors will probably be eligible to proceed of their positions in full compliance with regulation and rules until the chancellor points a last order, held Justice Devan Ramachandran who held a particular sitting to listen to the case at 4 pm on Monday.
The vice chancellors had approached the courtroom alleging that the Governor who can be the chancellor of universities directed them to resign with out following the process. The Governor directed the VCs to resign within the backdrop of the Supreme Court order settings apart the appointment of Kerala Technological University vice chancellor because the UGC rules weren’t adopted.
The petitioners asserted that the communication from the Governor was unlawful, incompetent and past the jurisdiction of the Governor. They argued that the Supreme Court order within the case of Kerala Technological University has no bearing on them. The counsel for the petitioners the Governor thrust his choice on them with out giving a chance to current their view.
They contended that the motion of Chancellor is in flagrant violation of ideas of honest play and pure justice.
The petitioners argued that the judgement referred to by the chancellor within the impugned communication couldn’t apply to petitioners as SC had delivered the judgement contemplating the 2010 UGC rules, whereas they had been appointed underneath 2018 rules.
The counsel for the chancellor argued that the communication to VCs was issued in good religion and with the intent to inform that their appointments had been unlawful. To save them the ignominy they got the choice for honourable exit.
The Governor acted in good religion as he’s absolutely conscious that each one are working for similar system. The chancellor had no possibility however to behave within the mild of SC judgements
