Cop, showroom to pay Rs 2.15 lakh to tractor proprietor

By Express News Service

SAMBALPUR: The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC) , Sambalpur has directed a former inspector-in-charge (IIC) of Sadar police station and the M/S Gromax Shiv Shakti Automobiles at Sindurpank beneath the Sadar police station in Sambalpur to pay compensation of Rs 1 lakh every individually to a buyer who bought a tractor, for inflicting him harassment and torture .

According to the judgment, the complainant, Vattikuti Veer Raju of Babebira Canal village beneath the Attabira police station in Bargarh district had bought a tractor from M/S Gromax Shiv Shakti Automobiles on December 16, 2019 for Rs 5.6 lakhs. The company obtained a brief certificates of registration and equipped the car from the Sonepur outlet. Later, the complainant had additionally registered the car with Bargarh Regional Transport Office on January 21, 2023 and was utilizing the car.

However, on January 22, 2023, the then IIC of Sadar police station known as up Raju and requested him to come back to the police station. There,  the complainant was advised that the car had been bought to a 3rd social gathering by M/S Gromax Shiv Shakti Automobiles. The IIC Sadar nevertheless stored the title of the client in darkish, and pressurised Raju to give up the car within the police station inside 10 days.Though Raju contacted the vendor again and again, he didn’t get any response. Raju then knocked the doorways of the buyer courtroom on February 13.

After going by means of the data, evidences and paperwork, the fee discovered that neither the vendor nor the IIC revealed the title of the third social gathering purchaser nor did they cite the authorized cause. Thus, deficiency in service was discovered on a part of the tractor vendor and IIC, Sadar police station. Stating it to be harassment, the fee questioned the rationale to name the complainant to give up the car, though it’s within the title of the complainant.

In addition to the compensation, the fee has additionally ordered to pay Rs 15,000 to the complainant in the direction of litigation bills. The fee has requested to pay the quantity inside 30 days from the date of order, failing which the quantity will additional carry 95 curiosity every year until realisation. The order was pronounced on October 9.

Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp

SAMBALPUR: The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (DCDRC) , Sambalpur has directed a former inspector-in-charge (IIC) of Sadar police station and the M/S Gromax Shiv Shakti Automobiles at Sindurpank beneath the Sadar police station in Sambalpur to pay compensation of Rs 1 lakh every individually to a buyer who bought a tractor, for inflicting him harassment and torture .

According to the judgment, the complainant, Vattikuti Veer Raju of Babebira Canal village beneath the Attabira police station in Bargarh district had bought a tractor from M/S Gromax Shiv Shakti Automobiles on December 16, 2019 for Rs 5.6 lakhs. The company obtained a brief certificates of registration and equipped the car from the Sonepur outlet. Later, the complainant had additionally registered the car with Bargarh Regional Transport Office on January 21, 2023 and was utilizing the car.

However, on January 22, 2023, the then IIC of Sadar police station known as up Raju and requested him to come back to the police station. There,  the complainant was advised that the car had been bought to a 3rd social gathering by M/S Gromax Shiv Shakti Automobiles. The IIC Sadar nevertheless stored the title of the client in darkish, and pressurised Raju to give up the car within the police station inside 10 days.Though Raju contacted the vendor again and again, he didn’t get any response. Raju then knocked the doorways of the buyer courtroom on February 13.googletag.cmd.push(perform() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

After going by means of the data, evidences and paperwork, the fee discovered that neither the vendor nor the IIC revealed the title of the third social gathering purchaser nor did they cite the authorized cause. Thus, deficiency in service was discovered on a part of the tractor vendor and IIC, Sadar police station. Stating it to be harassment, the fee questioned the rationale to name the complainant to give up the car, though it’s within the title of the complainant.

In addition to the compensation, the fee has additionally ordered to pay Rs 15,000 to the complainant in the direction of litigation bills. The fee has requested to pay the quantity inside 30 days from the date of order, failing which the quantity will additional carry 95 curiosity every year until realisation. The order was pronounced on October 9. Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp