Report Wire

News at Another Perspective

Supreme Court to listen to contempt plea in opposition to former AIFF president Praful Patel as FIFA threatens motion

3 min read

In May 2022, the Supreme Court appointed a Committee of Administrators for the day-to-day administration of the soccer federation and eliminated the exiting AIFF office-bearers as their time period in workplace had expired. The courtroom had additionally directed that the elections to the state our bodies and the AiFF should be carried out.

The COA has now approached the courtroom alleging interference by former AIFF chief Praful Patel and the opposite office-bearers.

On Wednesday, the Committee of directors of the All India Football Federation moved a contempt plea in opposition to Praful Patel and others for failing to make sure that state and Central soccer federation elections are held.

The Plea alleges that “Praful Patel who had been removed as President of the AIFF has consistently abused his position as Council Member of FIFA to orchestrate a campaign among the State Associations to undermine the various steps taken by this Hon’ble Court for the betterment of football, including having footballers involved in governance and administration. As recently as on 06.08.2022, the very deponents before this Court on behalf of the State Associations have participated in meetings conducted by Mr Patel where he impliedly admits that letters threatening suspension from the FIFA-AFC have been obtained to “help” them, and that the Government is convinced to seek a review of the order fearing the worst. It is clear that the Government has been misled by the State Associations, as have FIFA-AFC who are ignorant of the duplicitous role being played by Mr. Patel.”

The contempt plea has additionally identified that Patel despatched out a letter claiming that “appointment of the CoA by this Hon’ble Court would be interpreted by FIFA and AFC as “undue third-party influence” and that India could be suspended from both bodies and also jeopardize the Asian Cup Qualifiers in June 2022 and the FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup scheduled for October 2022”.

The plea has claimed that Patel and the state office-bearers had “misled” the FIFA AFC in addition to giving incorrect data to the Sports Ministry. The matter was talked about for pressing listening to earlier than the Supreme courtroom on Wednesday and is scheduled to be heard on Thursday.

The petition has named Patel Satyanarayan, General Secretary, Karnataka State Football Association, Avijit Paul, Joint Secretary, Football Association of Odisha; Lalnghinglova Hmar, Honorary Secretary, Mizoram Football Association; Mulrajsingh Chudasama, Honorary Secretary, Gujarat State Football Association; Shaji Prabhakaran, President, Football Delhi; Subrata Dutta, Chairman, Indian Football Association (West Bengal); and Vijay Bali, Joint Secretary, Punjab Football Association as contemnors for the joint letter despatched out by them.

While mentioning the matter earlier than the bench of justices Dy Chandrachud, Suryakant and AS Bopanna on Wednesday, senior advocate Gopal Sankarnarayanan, showing for the CoA, knowledgeable courtroom that “some entities are interfering with your lordship’s order to conduct the election. We have preferred a contempt on behalf of CoA.”

ASG Sanjay Jain, showing for the central authorities, additionally knowledgeable the bench that “FIFA has said that they will withdraw hosting rights.”

The Sports ministry has additionally filed an utility for modification of the Supreme courtroom order, submitting that “FIFA’s letter is striking at the very root of the interim order. That is why the application is filed.” The COA has nonetheless argued that the applying filed by the ministry was as a result of “misinformation ” and the affect of Patel and the state federation office-bearers.

The bench on Wednesday requested the Center and CoA to “engage with FIFA, so that the needful is done and the tournament is held.”

The courtroom agreed to listen to the matter intimately, however has noticed that “the way forward is through dialogue”.

— ENDS —