Widowed daughter-in-law needn’t pay maintenance to her parents-in-law: Bombay HC

By PTI

MUMBAI: The Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court has dominated {{that a}} daughter-in-law needn’t pay maintenance to the dad and mother of her deceased husband.

A single bench of Justice Kishor Sant on April 12 handed its order on a petition filed by a 38-year-old woman, Shobha Tidke, tough an order handed by the Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya (native courtroom docket) at Latur metropolis in Maharashtra directing her to pay maintenance to the dad and mother of her deceased husband.

“By reading of section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is clear that the father-in-law and mother-in-law are not mentioned in the said section,” the HC talked about in its order.

Shobha’s husband, who used to work with the MSRTC (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation), had died, after which she started engaged on the state-run JJ Hospital in Mumbai.

Kishanrao Tidke (68) and Kantabai Tidke (60), the in-laws of Shobha Tidke, claimed they haven’t any provide of earnings after the dying of their son and as a consequence of this truth sought maintenance.

The woman claimed that her husband’s dad and mother private land and a house of their village and had moreover obtained Rs 1.88 lakh from MSRTC as compensation.

The extreme courtroom docket in its order talked about there was nothing to level that the job secured by Shobha Tidke was on compassionate ground.

“It is clear that the deceased husband was working in MSRTC, whereas now the petitioner (Shobha) is appointed in the health department of the State Government. Thus it is clear that the appointment is not on compassionate grounds,” the courtroom docket talked about.

It added that the dad and mother of the deceased man had obtained compensation amount after the dying of their son they normally private land and their very own residence.

“This court finds that no case is made out by the respondents (parents) to claim maintenance from the petitioner,” HC talked about.

MUMBAI: The Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court has dominated {{that a}} daughter-in-law needn’t pay maintenance to the dad and mother of her deceased husband.

A single bench of Justice Kishor Sant on April 12 handed its order on a petition filed by a 38-year-old woman, Shobha Tidke, tough an order handed by the Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya (native courtroom docket) at Latur metropolis in Maharashtra directing her to pay maintenance to the dad and mother of her deceased husband.

“By reading of section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is clear that the father-in-law and mother-in-law are not mentioned in the said section,” the HC talked about in its order.googletag.cmd.push(carry out() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

Shobha’s husband, who used to work with the MSRTC (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation), had died, after which she started engaged on the state-run JJ Hospital in Mumbai.

Kishanrao Tidke (68) and Kantabai Tidke (60), the in-laws of Shobha Tidke, claimed they haven’t any provide of earnings after the dying of their son and as a consequence of this truth sought maintenance.

The woman claimed that her husband’s dad and mother private land and a house of their village and had moreover obtained Rs 1.88 lakh from MSRTC as compensation.

The extreme courtroom docket in its order talked about there was nothing to level that the job secured by Shobha Tidke was on compassionate ground.

“It is clear that the deceased husband was working in MSRTC, whereas now the petitioner (Shobha) is appointed in the health department of the State Government. Thus it is clear that the appointment is not on compassionate grounds,” the courtroom docket talked about.

It added that the dad and mother of the deceased man had obtained compensation amount after the dying of their son they normally private land and their very own residence.

“This court finds that no case is made out by the respondents (parents) to claim maintenance from the petitioner,” HC talked about.