Supreme Court assist for two senior UP bureaucrats
2 min readExpress News Service
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the discharge of two Uttar Pradesh IAS officers (finance secretary SMA Rizvi and explicit secretary (finance) Sarayu Prasad Mishra) who’ve been taken into custody pursuant to an Allahabad HC order on account of their failure to produce providers for retired judges.
A bench of CJI DY Chandrachud, whereas ordering their launch extra stayed HC’s order of issuing bailable warrants to the state’s chief secretary and additional chief secretary and posted plea for April 28.
“Till the next date of listening to, there’ll maintain of orders handed by the HC on April 4 and April 19.
The officers shall be launched forthwith,” the bench said. Court’s route acquired right here pursuant to the plea being talked about by ASG KM Nataraj sooner than the bench. Terming the incident as “unfortunate”, ASG urged the bench to direct for launch of the two officers.
The state had approached SC in opposition to HCs’ April 4 and April 19 orders. HC in its April 4 order had directed the state to implement a rule for providing providers to retired judges. Failure of the state to behave on the order had resulted in April 19 order whereby, issuing contempt notices in opposition to the two officers had directed their arrest.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the discharge of two Uttar Pradesh IAS officers (finance secretary SMA Rizvi and explicit secretary (finance) Sarayu Prasad Mishra) who’ve been taken into custody pursuant to an Allahabad HC order on account of their failure to produce providers for retired judges.
A bench of CJI DY Chandrachud, whereas ordering their launch extra stayed HC’s order of issuing bailable warrants to the state’s chief secretary and additional chief secretary and posted plea for April 28.
“Till the next date of listening to, there’ll maintain of orders handed by the HC on April 4 and April 19.
The officers shall be launched forthwith,” the bench said. Court’s route acquired right here pursuant to the plea being talked about by ASG KM Nataraj sooner than the bench. Terming the incident as “unfortunate”, ASG urged the bench to direct for launch of the two officers. googletag.cmd.push(carry out() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2′); );
The state had approached SC in opposition to HCs’ April 4 and April 19 orders. HC in its April 4 order had directed the state to implement a rule for providing providers to retired judges. Failure of the state to behave on the order had resulted in April 19 order whereby, issuing contempt notices in opposition to the two officers had directed their arrest.
