Sunni Waqf Board strikes Allahabad HC in opposition to Varanasi courtroom order in Kashi Vishwanath Mandir-Gyanvapi Masjid case

The Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board on Tuesday moved an pressing petition earlier than the Allahabad High Court within the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir-Gyanvapi Masjid case through which the trial courtroom at Varanasi allowed an ASI research of the mosque on April 8.
Sunni Central Waqf Board’s standing counsel Puneet Kumar Gupta argued that the trial courtroom handed the order illegally and with out its jurisdiction because the matter is within the excessive courtroom and Justice Prakash Pandia reserved its order on March 15 this 12 months.
“We moved the Allahabad High Court today against the judgment of the lower court and filed a petition,” Gupta, a everlasting advocate of the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board, instructed PTI.
“Since Justice Prakash Padiya of the Allahabad High Court reserved the judgment on March 15, 2021, how can the lower court hear the matter and pass the order?” he requested.

Earlier on Monday, the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, administration committee of the Gyanvapi mosque, moved an utility earlier than the Allahabad High Court within the case in opposition to the April 8 order of the trial courtroom at Varanasi.
Counsel for the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, SFA Naqvi prayed for keep of operation of the April 8 order of the Varanasi courtroom contending that the Allahabad High Court had reserved its judgment on the maintainability of the swimsuit pending within the Varanasi courtroom, which is listening to the contentions of the alternative celebration (the Temple belief).

On April 8, the Varanasi courtroom allowed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) research of the Gyanvapi Mosque adjoining to the Kashi Vishwanath Temple.
The courtroom ordered an archaeological survey of a centuries-old mosque complicated abutting the well-known Kashi Vishwanath temple, saying the train was required to determine on pleas that allege the mosque was constructed by Mughal emperors after partially demolishing a Hindu shrine.
The swimsuit was filed in 1991 looking for restoration of the traditional temple on the web site the place the Gyanvapi Mosque at the moment stands.

On March 15, the Allahabad High Court reserved its judgment in varied pleas, which had challenged the maintainability of the 1991 swimsuit earlier than the Varanasi trial courtroom, looking for restoration of an historic temple on the web site the place the Gyanvapi Mosque at Varanasi now stands.