‘RSS, Modi wish to change Constitution’: AAP’s Sanjay Singh on changing ‘India’ with ‘Bharat’
4 min readBy ANI
NEW DELHI: Aam Adami Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh on Tuesday alleged that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-led by Mohan Bhagwat desires to alter the Constitution of the nation by ‘removing’ the phrase ‘India’ with Bharat.
Notably earlier this month, Mohan Bhagwat stated that individuals ought to use the title “Bharat” as an alternative of India, and urged individuals to inculcate the behavior.
Further, citing the media experiences which declare that the Central authorities is ‘planning’ to take away the phrase India from the Constitution, Sanjay Singh questioned why Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mohan Bhagwat have ‘hate’ for Bhim Rao Ambedkar who was chargeable for drafting the structure.
“Babasaheb Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar wrote in the constitution–“India That Is Bharat”. But Modi and RSS who hate Babasaheb want to change the constitution. Why do Bhagwat and Modi hate Babasaheb so much?” Sanjay Singh stated in his submit on ‘X’.
Singh additionally shared the provisions talked about within the Article 1 of the Constitution
VIDEO | “BJP and RSS hate Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar and the Dalits of this country. I want to warn BJP and RSS not to play with the Constitution of India,” says AAP MP @SanjayAzadSln on purported debate over ‘India’ phrase within the Constitution. pic.twitter.com/HIMpNwbQlS
— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) September 5, 2023
ALSO READ | G20 invite says ‘President of Bharat’ as an alternative of ‘President of India’
RSS chief, throughout his deal with in Guwahati, stated that the title Bharat has been persevering with since historical instances and should be taken ahead.
“The name of our country has been Bharat for ages. Whatever may be the language, the name remains the same,” Mr Bhagwat stated at a programme organised by the Sakal Jain Samaj.
The BJP has been attacking the brand new opposition bloc INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) by repeatedly declaring that the title ‘India’ is a remnant of a colonial previous.
BJP Rajya Sabha MP Naresh Bansal additionally pitched the proposal throughout the just lately concluded monsoon session within the Upper House, saying that the title ‘India’ is an emblem of “colonial slavery” and “should be removed from the Constitution”.
“The British modified Bharat’s title to India. Under Article 1, the Constitution states: ‘India, that’s Bharat’. Our nation has been identified by the title ‘Bharat’ for hundreds of years … it’s this nation’s historical title and is present in historical Sanskrit texts. The title ‘India’ was given by the colonial Raj and is thus an emblem of slavery. The title India must be faraway from the Constitution,” the Rajya Sabha MP stated.
NEW DELHI: Aam Adami Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh on Tuesday alleged that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-led by Mohan Bhagwat desires to alter the Constitution of the nation by ‘removing’ the phrase ‘India’ with Bharat.
Notably earlier this month, Mohan Bhagwat stated that individuals ought to use the title “Bharat” as an alternative of India, and urged individuals to inculcate the behavior.
Further, citing the media experiences which declare that the Central authorities is ‘planning’ to take away the phrase India from the Constitution, Sanjay Singh questioned why Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mohan Bhagwat have ‘hate’ for Bhim Rao Ambedkar who was chargeable for drafting the structure.googletag.cmd.push(operate() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
“Babasaheb Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar wrote in the constitution–“India That Is Bharat”. But Modi and RSS who hate Babasaheb want to change the constitution. Why do Bhagwat and Modi hate Babasaheb so much?” Sanjay Singh stated in his submit on ‘X’.
Singh additionally shared the provisions talked about within the Article 1 of the Constitution
VIDEO | “BJP and RSS hate Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar and the Dalits of this country. I want to warn BJP and RSS not to play with the Constitution of India,” says AAP MP @SanjayAzadSln on purported debate over ‘India’ phrase within the Constitution. pic.twitter.com/HIMpNwbQlS
— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) September 5, 2023
ALSO READ | G20 invite says ‘President of Bharat’ as an alternative of ‘President of India’
RSS chief, throughout his deal with in Guwahati, stated that the title Bharat has been persevering with since historical instances and should be taken ahead.
“The name of our country has been Bharat for ages. Whatever may be the language, the name remains the same,” Mr Bhagwat stated at a programme organised by the Sakal Jain Samaj.
The BJP has been attacking the brand new opposition bloc INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) by repeatedly declaring that the title ‘India’ is a remnant of a colonial previous.
BJP Rajya Sabha MP Naresh Bansal additionally pitched the proposal throughout the just lately concluded monsoon session within the Upper House, saying that the title ‘India’ is an emblem of “colonial slavery” and “should be removed from the Constitution”.
“The British modified Bharat’s title to India. Under Article 1, the Constitution states: ‘India, that’s Bharat’. Our nation has been identified by the title ‘Bharat’ for hundreds of years … it’s this nation’s historical title and is present in historical Sanskrit texts. The title ‘India’ was given by the colonial Raj and is thus an emblem of slavery. The title India must be faraway from the Constitution,” the Rajya Sabha MP stated.
