Nisith Pramanik convoy assault: SC models aside HC order, orders up to date probe on PIL

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday put apart Calcutta High Court’s order which directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe into the assault on Minister of State (Home) Nisith Pramanik in Cooch Behar district on February 25. Minister’s convoy was attacked when he was visiting his constituency. 

Noting that the HC did not take into consideration all the pieces of the information, a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI)DY Chandrachud, Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala requested the HC to consider the matter as soon as extra.

The bench whereas keeping apart HCs order took cognisance of the affidavit filed by the Superintendent of Police and the steps taken by the police authorities. 

The excessive courtroom docket moreover talked about that the HC did not make discover of the 21 arrests, and registration of six explicit situations of ransacking and harm, regardless that it was educated of it. 

The HCs March 28, 2023 order was handed in a PIL instituted by Suvendhu Adhikari, MLA and LoP in West Bengal Assembly which alleged that the assault was on the behest of the TMC get collectively and thus the police did not take any movement in opposition to the perpetrators.

While directing CBI to probe into the assault the HC had talked about that the investigation is not on observe and thus it is wanted for the probe to be carried out by an unbiased firm.
 
“The incident is admitted and is of serious nature relating to the attack on a car and convoy of HMoS Union of India. Therefore, non-registration of the complaint promptly supports the apprehension in the mind of the petitioner. That apart, the complaint mentions the names of as many as 30 offenders, but no prompt action against them is reflected,” the HC had talked about in its order. 

For the state, Senior Advocates AM Singhvi and Gopal Sankaranarayanan argued that the judgement has missed positive important sides of the standing report which current that the police had been investigating. 

For Adhikari, Senior Advocate PS Patwalia contended that the HC was justified in transferring the investigation as a result of the incident took place on twenty fifth Feb and the FIR lodged on twenty sixth pertained to workers of BJP ransacking the office of the ruling political get collectively.

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday put apart Calcutta High Court’s order which directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe into the assault on Minister of State (Home) Nisith Pramanik in Cooch Behar district on February 25. Minister’s convoy was attacked when he was visiting his constituency. 

Noting that the HC did not take into consideration all the pieces of the information, a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI)DY Chandrachud, Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala requested the HC to consider the matter as soon as extra.

The bench whereas keeping apart HCs order took cognisance of the affidavit filed by the Superintendent of Police and the steps taken by the police authorities. googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

The excessive courtroom docket moreover talked about that the HC did not make discover of the 21 arrests, and registration of six explicit situations of ransacking and harm, regardless that it was educated of it. 

The HCs March 28, 2023 order was handed in a PIL instituted by Suvendhu Adhikari, MLA and LoP in West Bengal Assembly which alleged that the assault was on the behest of the TMC get collectively and thus the police did not take any movement in opposition to the perpetrators.

While directing CBI to probe into the assault the HC had talked about that the investigation is not on observe and thus it is wanted for the probe to be carried out by an unbiased firm.
 
“The incident is admitted and is of serious nature relating to the attack on a car and convoy of HMoS Union of India. Therefore, non-registration of the complaint promptly supports the apprehension in the mind of the petitioner. That apart, the complaint mentions the names of as many as 30 offenders, but no prompt action against them is reflected,” the HC had talked about in its order. 

For the state, Senior Advocates AM Singhvi and Gopal Sankaranarayanan argued that the judgement has missed positive important sides of the standing report which current that the police had been investigating. 

For Adhikari, Senior Advocate PS Patwalia contended that the HC was justified in transferring the investigation as a result of the incident took place on twenty fifth Feb and the FIR lodged on twenty sixth pertained to workers of BJP ransacking the office of the ruling political get collectively.