Lawyers can’t go on strike or abstain from judicial works: Supreme Court

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday talked about authorized professionals cannot go on strike or abstain from work and directed all extreme courts to characterize a grievance redressal committee on the state stage headed by the chief justice, the place advocates might make representations for redressal of “genuine problems”.

A bench headed by Justices MR Shah and Ahsanuddin Amanullah talked about {{that a}} separate grievance redressal committee be constituted on the district courtroom stage to supply a dialogue board, the place authorized professionals might search redressal of their actual grievances related to procedural changes in submitting or itemizing of situations or misbehaviour of member of the lower judiciary.

“We once again reiterate that no member of the bar can go on strike. Time and again this court has emphasised that advocates going on strike or abstaining from their work hampers judicial work”, the bench talked about.

The courtroom disposed of an utility filed by the District Bar Association of Dehradun in the hunt for an relevant dialogue board for the redressal of their complaints and directed the registry to ship a reproduction of this order to the registrar primary of all extreme courts for taking steps in accordance with the order.

Justice Shah, who pronounced the order, talked about if members of the bar have some actual grievance or face problem because of the procedural changes in submitting and itemizing of points or any actual grievance pertaining to the misbehaviour of member of the lower judiciary, they’re going to very correctly make a illustration for redressal of actual grievance by some dialogue board so that such strikes might presumably be averted.

It talked about the dialogue board must be a spot the place members of the bar can vent their grievances.

“Therefore, we request all high courts to constitute a grievance redressal committee in their respective high courts which may be headed by the chief justice and such a grievance redressal committee should consist of two other senior judges–one each from the judicial services and one from the bar–to be nominated by the chief justice as well as the advocate general of the state, chairman of the bar council of the state and the president of the high court bar association”, it talked about.

The bench talked about the extreme courts may additionally characterize the identical grievance redressal committee on the district courtroom stage.

“It is observed that the grievance redressal committee will consider the genuine grievances related to the difference of opinion or dissatisfaction due to procedural changes in filing and listing of the matter in respective high courts or any district courts in their respective states and any genuine grievance pertaining to misbehaviour of any member of lower judiciary provided such grievance must be genuine and not to put any pressure on any judicial officer”, the bench talked about.

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday talked about authorized professionals cannot go on strike or abstain from work and directed all extreme courts to characterize a grievance redressal committee on the state stage headed by the chief justice, the place advocates might make representations for redressal of “genuine problems”.

A bench headed by Justices MR Shah and Ahsanuddin Amanullah talked about {{that a}} separate grievance redressal committee be constituted on the district courtroom stage to supply a dialogue board, the place authorized professionals might search redressal of their actual grievances related to procedural changes in submitting or itemizing of situations or misbehaviour of member of the lower judiciary.

“We once again reiterate that no member of the bar can go on strike. Time and again this court has emphasised that advocates going on strike or abstaining from their work hampers judicial work”, the bench talked about.googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

The courtroom disposed of an utility filed by the District Bar Association of Dehradun in the hunt for an relevant dialogue board for the redressal of their complaints and directed the registry to ship a reproduction of this order to the registrar primary of all extreme courts for taking steps in accordance with the order.

Justice Shah, who pronounced the order, talked about if members of the bar have some actual grievance or face problem because of the procedural changes in submitting and itemizing of points or any actual grievance pertaining to the misbehaviour of member of the lower judiciary, they’re going to very correctly make a illustration for redressal of actual grievance by some dialogue board so that such strikes might presumably be averted.

It talked about the dialogue board must be a spot the place members of the bar can vent their grievances.

“Therefore, we request all high courts to constitute a grievance redressal committee in their respective high courts which may be headed by the chief justice and such a grievance redressal committee should consist of two other senior judges–one each from the judicial services and one from the bar–to be nominated by the chief justice as well as the advocate general of the state, chairman of the bar council of the state and the president of the high court bar association”, it talked about.

The bench talked about the extreme courts may additionally characterize the identical grievance redressal committee on the district courtroom stage.

“It is observed that the grievance redressal committee will consider the genuine grievances related to the difference of opinion or dissatisfaction due to procedural changes in filing and listing of the matter in respective high courts or any district courts in their respective states and any genuine grievance pertaining to misbehaviour of any member of lower judiciary provided such grievance must be genuine and not to put any pressure on any judicial officer”, the bench talked about.