Gyanvapi drawback: Pleas of 4 Hindu girls plaintiffs to be shifted to Varanasi district courtroom

Express News Service

LUCKNOW: In a major dedication, Varanasi District Court Judge Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha on Monday accepted the plea of 4 Hindu girls plaintiffs in swimsuit no. 18/2022 (Rakhi Singh vs state of UP and others) looking for change of seven circumstances related to the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri drawback from quite a few courts to his courtroom. As per district authorities counsel (civil) Mahendra Prasad Pandey, the district determine ordered to change seven circumstances related to Gyanvapi mosque drawback to his courtroom by accepting the plea of plaintiffs 2 to 5 (Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak) the place that that they had sought frequent worship of Maa Shringar Gauri and completely different deities on the Gyanvapi mosque premises.

In his order, district determine Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha moreover talked about that after the change of the seven Gyanvapi related circumstances pending in quite a few civil courts to his courtroom, the problem of their consolidation may very well be examined to determine whether or not or not it will likely be associated or not. The subsequent date for listening to throughout the case was posted on April 21.

ALSO READ | In UP badlands, will Atiq’s killing see new breed of criminals who search fame by specializing in bigger fish?

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain representing 4 girls plaintiffs had moved an utility on December 5, 2022 for change of seven circumstances along with the one filed by Bhagwan Aadi Vishweshwar Viraajman via subsequent good good friend Kiran Singh and others pending with civil determine (senior division) Fast Track Court and completely different six circumstances to the district determine courtroom.

Jain, in his utility, had talked about that these six circumstances pending throughout the courtroom of civil determine (senior division) and the one in fast-track courtroom of the civil determine (senior division) had been of comparable nature, due to this fact within the occasion that that they had been tried collectively, it would save every most people time and money along with avoiding completely different licensed challenges.

However, Shivam Gaur, the advocate of plaintiff-1 Rakhi Singh and Anjuman Intejamia Masajid (AIM) — the Gyanvapi mosque administration committee — had strongly opposed the making use of to membership all the petitions of their arguments which had been achieved on February 22 when the courtroom had reserved its order. However, when contacted, Gaur acknowledged that he was proud of the order of the courtroom as a result of it had ordered for lower than their change from completely different courts to his courtroom so far and by no means for consolidating them.

LUCKNOW: In a major dedication, Varanasi District Court Judge Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha on Monday accepted the plea of 4 Hindu girls plaintiffs in swimsuit no. 18/2022 (Rakhi Singh vs state of UP and others) looking for change of seven circumstances related to the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri drawback from quite a few courts to his courtroom. As per district authorities counsel (civil) Mahendra Prasad Pandey, the district determine ordered to change seven circumstances related to Gyanvapi mosque drawback to his courtroom by accepting the plea of plaintiffs 2 to 5 (Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak) the place that that they had sought frequent worship of Maa Shringar Gauri and completely different deities on the Gyanvapi mosque premises.

In his order, district determine Dr Ajay Krishna Vishvesha moreover talked about that after the change of the seven Gyanvapi related circumstances pending in quite a few civil courts to his courtroom, the problem of their consolidation may very well be examined to determine whether or not or not it will likely be associated or not. The subsequent date for listening to throughout the case was posted on April 21.

ALSO READ | In UP badlands, will Atiq’s killing see new breed of criminals who search fame by specializing in bigger fish?googletag.cmd.push(carry out() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain representing 4 girls plaintiffs had moved an utility on December 5, 2022 for change of seven circumstances along with the one filed by Bhagwan Aadi Vishweshwar Viraajman via subsequent good good friend Kiran Singh and others pending with civil determine (senior division) Fast Track Court and completely different six circumstances to the district determine courtroom.

Jain, in his utility, had talked about that these six circumstances pending throughout the courtroom of civil determine (senior division) and the one in fast-track courtroom of the civil determine (senior division) had been of comparable nature, due to this fact within the occasion that that they had been tried collectively, it would save every most people time and money along with avoiding completely different licensed challenges.

However, Shivam Gaur, the advocate of plaintiff-1 Rakhi Singh and Anjuman Intejamia Masajid (AIM) — the Gyanvapi mosque administration committee — had strongly opposed the making use of to membership all the petitions of their arguments which had been achieved on February 22 when the courtroom had reserved its order. However, when contacted, Gaur acknowledged that he was proud of the order of the courtroom as a result of it had ordered for lower than their change from completely different courts to his courtroom so far and by no means for consolidating them.