Report Wire

News at Another Perspective

Four candidates who misplaced Gujarat polls transfer High Court, search assessment of outcomes

3 min read

Express News Service

AHMEDABAD: Four candidates who misplaced the 2022 Assembly election approached the Gujarat High Court in search of to assessment the outcomes.

The petitioners had been two candidates of the Gujarat Congress Lalit Kagthra and Raghu Desai and two candidates of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Harshad Ribdia and Hitesh Vasava.

The petition was filed beneath the Representation of the People Act, of 1951. The outcomes of the Gujarat meeting elections had been declared in December 2022. 

In a dialog with The New Indian Express, Lalit Kagathara, the Congress candidate who misplaced the Tankara seat, mentioned, “At the time of the election, there were several errors in the affidavit of the BJP candidate Durabh Vekaria. I had brought this to the notice of the Returning Officer (RO) at that time. But the RO declined to look into my complaint properly.”

“There were many errors in Durhabbhai’s form; I pointed out to the RO that the BJP candidate had left blank more than 13 columns in his form which required answers and had given some wrong information. He gave his educational qualification as SSC without mentioning the year in which he passed which is mandatory,” mentioned Lalit.

“Apart from this, he has not given the checking account particulars. He did not disclose his earnings tax returns; he did not give correct particulars concerning the immovable property as nicely,” he added.

BJP’s Visavdar candidate Harshad Ribdia has submitted in his utility that the profitable Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) candidate Bhupendra Bhayani has not talked about the main points of instances registered towards him about corruption and fraud in his affidavit, in addition to this, he has additionally hidden the main points of his sons proudly owning factories.

Congress candidate Raghu Desai mentioned in his utility that after the voting we now have been given a certificates of 58% voting however at 10 pm the election officer declared 64% voting.

In the petition, the petitioners have made the Election Commission and Returning Officer, a celebration. 

AHMEDABAD: Four candidates who misplaced the 2022 Assembly election approached the Gujarat High Court in search of to assessment the outcomes.

The petitioners had been two candidates of the Gujarat Congress Lalit Kagthra and Raghu Desai and two candidates of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Harshad Ribdia and Hitesh Vasava.

The petition was filed beneath the Representation of the People Act, of 1951. The outcomes of the Gujarat meeting elections had been declared in December 2022. 

In a dialog with The New Indian Express, Lalit Kagathara, the Congress candidate who misplaced the Tankara seat, mentioned, “At the time of the election, there were several errors in the affidavit of the BJP candidate Durabh Vekaria. I had brought this to the notice of the Returning Officer (RO) at that time. But the RO declined to look into my complaint properly.”

“There were many errors in Durhabbhai’s form; I pointed out to the RO that the BJP candidate had left blank more than 13 columns in his form which required answers and had given some wrong information. He gave his educational qualification as SSC without mentioning the year in which he passed which is mandatory,” mentioned Lalit.

“Apart from this, he has not given the checking account particulars. He did not disclose his earnings tax returns; he did not give correct particulars concerning the immovable property as nicely,” he added.

BJP’s Visavdar candidate Harshad Ribdia has submitted in his utility that the profitable Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) candidate Bhupendra Bhayani has not talked about the main points of instances registered towards him about corruption and fraud in his affidavit, in addition to this, he has additionally hidden the main points of his sons proudly owning factories.

Congress candidate Raghu Desai mentioned in his utility that after the voting we now have been given a certificates of 58% voting however at 10 pm the election officer declared 64% voting.

In the petition, the petitioners have made the Election Commission and Returning Officer, a celebration.