Report Wire

News at Another Perspective

Attack on Owaisi in UP: Supreme Court quashes HC order granting bail to 2 accused

4 min read

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday quashed an Allahabad High Court order granting bail to 2 males accused of firing at AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi’s car in Uttar Pradesh in February and gave them one week to give up.

The high courtroom mentioned the seriousness of the alleged offence has not been thought-about by the excessive courtroom.

A bench of justices M R Shah and M M Sundresh mentioned the excessive courtroom didn’t accord any cause whereas giving bail.

The apex courtroom remanded the matter again to the excessive courtroom for contemporary consideration and directed Sachin Sharma and Shubham Gurjar to give up earlier than the police inside every week.

The high courtroom additionally directed the excessive courtroom to determine the bail purposes of the 2 accused inside 4 weeks from the date of give up.

“Having gone by means of the impugned judgement of the excessive courtroom, it may be seen that there are not any causes given in any respect by the excessive courtroom whereas releasing the accused on bail.

“It has also not given any prima facie opinion on material collected during the course of the investigation which is now forming the part of charge sheet. Even the seriousness the offence alleged has not been considered by the high court. In that view of the matter, the impugned judgement of the high court needs to be quashed and set aside,” the bench mentioned.

In his petition earlier than the apex courtroom, Owaisi challenged the bail granted to them, saying this was a basic instance of a disproportionate quantity of prejudice and hate-related crimes resulting in the incident of an try and homicide and the goal was a identified MP.

The All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief’s automotive was attacked in Hapur whereas he was returning to Delhi after attending election-related occasions in western Uttar Pradesh on February 3, every week earlier than meeting polls started within the state.

Later, the police arrested three individuals — Sharma, Gurjar, and Aalim — for his or her alleged involvement within the incident.

The high courtroom in September dismissed the problem to the bail granted to Aalim.

In his plea, Owaisi submitted that after accused Sachin got here out on bail, he once more threatened the petitioner with critical penalties.

The mentioned assertion made in public is grave and requires to be taken into cognisance.

More importantly, the accused has not denied his involvement somewhat it seems that he’s taking pleasure in endeavor this crime, the plea mentioned, including that Owaisi was the sufferer of the incident of this try of homicide by the accused whose motion was recorded in CCTV footage which was now a part of the cost sheet.

After the arrest of the accused, the police mentioned two pistols have been seized from their possession and a Maruti Alto automotive was additionally impounded.

The FIR was lodged at Pilakhua Police Station underneath numerous provisions of the IPC, together with Section 307 (try and homicide).

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday quashed an Allahabad High Court order granting bail to 2 males accused of firing at AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi’s car in Uttar Pradesh in February and gave them one week to give up.

The high courtroom mentioned the seriousness of the alleged offence has not been thought-about by the excessive courtroom.

A bench of justices M R Shah and M M Sundresh mentioned the excessive courtroom didn’t accord any cause whereas giving bail.

The apex courtroom remanded the matter again to the excessive courtroom for contemporary consideration and directed Sachin Sharma and Shubham Gurjar to give up earlier than the police inside every week.

The high courtroom additionally directed the excessive courtroom to determine the bail purposes of the 2 accused inside 4 weeks from the date of give up.

“Having gone by means of the impugned judgement of the excessive courtroom, it may be seen that there are not any causes given in any respect by the excessive courtroom whereas releasing the accused on bail.

“It has also not given any prima facie opinion on material collected during the course of the investigation which is now forming the part of charge sheet. Even the seriousness the offence alleged has not been considered by the high court. In that view of the matter, the impugned judgement of the high court needs to be quashed and set aside,” the bench mentioned.

In his petition earlier than the apex courtroom, Owaisi challenged the bail granted to them, saying this was a basic instance of a disproportionate quantity of prejudice and hate-related crimes resulting in the incident of an try and homicide and the goal was a identified MP.

The All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief’s automotive was attacked in Hapur whereas he was returning to Delhi after attending election-related occasions in western Uttar Pradesh on February 3, every week earlier than meeting polls started within the state.

Later, the police arrested three individuals — Sharma, Gurjar, and Aalim — for his or her alleged involvement within the incident.

The high courtroom in September dismissed the problem to the bail granted to Aalim.

In his plea, Owaisi submitted that after accused Sachin got here out on bail, he once more threatened the petitioner with critical penalties.

The mentioned assertion made in public is grave and requires to be taken into cognisance.

More importantly, the accused has not denied his involvement somewhat it seems that he’s taking pleasure in endeavor this crime, the plea mentioned, including that Owaisi was the sufferer of the incident of this try of homicide by the accused whose motion was recorded in CCTV footage which was now a part of the cost sheet.

After the arrest of the accused, the police mentioned two pistols have been seized from their possession and a Maruti Alto automotive was additionally impounded.

The FIR was lodged at Pilakhua Police Station underneath numerous provisions of the IPC, together with Section 307 (try and homicide).