51 former and sitting MPs face trial underneath PMLA, SC instructed
3 min readBy PTI
NEW DELHI: Fifty-one former and sitting parliamentarians face Prevention of Money Laundering Act instances lodged by the Enforcement Directorate, the Supreme Court has been knowledgeable.
However, the report doesn’t point out how lots of the 51 are sitting and former members of parliament (MPs).
A report submitted earlier than the highest court docket additionally apprised it that 71 Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) and Members of Legislative Council (MLCs) are accused in instances arising out of offences underneath Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Senior advocate Vijay Hansaria, who has been appointed as amicus curiae in a plea for expeditious disposal of felony instances towards MPs and MLAs, knowledgeable the highest court docket in his report on this regard.
The standing report additionally knowledgeable that 121 instances lodged by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) are pending towards MPs and MLAs, together with former and sitting members.
The prime court docket infrequently has been passing instructions on the plea filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay for making certain expeditious trial of instances towards lawmakers and speedy investigation by the CBI and different businesses.
The amicus submitted that regardless of a collection of instructions by the Supreme Court and common monitoring, numerous felony instances are pending towards MPs and MLAs, many for greater than 5 years.
The apex court docket had earlier requested all excessive courts to furnish particulars of felony instances pending for over 5 years towards MPs and MLAs, and the steps taken for his or her speedy disposal.
It had additionally modified its August 10, 2021 order by which it had stated judicial officers, who’re holding trial of instances towards regulation makers, shouldn’t be modified with out the prior permission of the court docket.
On August 10 final 12 months, the Supreme Court had curtailed the facility of state prosecutors and dominated that they can not withdraw prosecution towards lawmakers underneath the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) with out the prior sanction of excessive courts.
It had expressed sturdy displeasure over the non-filing of requisite standing reviews by the Centre and its businesses such because the CBI, and indicated it could arrange a particular bench within the prime court docket to observe felony instances towards politicians.
NEW DELHI: Fifty-one former and sitting parliamentarians face Prevention of Money Laundering Act instances lodged by the Enforcement Directorate, the Supreme Court has been knowledgeable.
However, the report doesn’t point out how lots of the 51 are sitting and former members of parliament (MPs).
A report submitted earlier than the highest court docket additionally apprised it that 71 Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) and Members of Legislative Council (MLCs) are accused in instances arising out of offences underneath Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Senior advocate Vijay Hansaria, who has been appointed as amicus curiae in a plea for expeditious disposal of felony instances towards MPs and MLAs, knowledgeable the highest court docket in his report on this regard.
The standing report additionally knowledgeable that 121 instances lodged by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) are pending towards MPs and MLAs, together with former and sitting members.
The prime court docket infrequently has been passing instructions on the plea filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay for making certain expeditious trial of instances towards lawmakers and speedy investigation by the CBI and different businesses.
The amicus submitted that regardless of a collection of instructions by the Supreme Court and common monitoring, numerous felony instances are pending towards MPs and MLAs, many for greater than 5 years.
The apex court docket had earlier requested all excessive courts to furnish particulars of felony instances pending for over 5 years towards MPs and MLAs, and the steps taken for his or her speedy disposal.
It had additionally modified its August 10, 2021 order by which it had stated judicial officers, who’re holding trial of instances towards regulation makers, shouldn’t be modified with out the prior permission of the court docket.
On August 10 final 12 months, the Supreme Court had curtailed the facility of state prosecutors and dominated that they can not withdraw prosecution towards lawmakers underneath the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) with out the prior sanction of excessive courts.
It had expressed sturdy displeasure over the non-filing of requisite standing reviews by the Centre and its businesses such because the CBI, and indicated it could arrange a particular bench within the prime court docket to observe felony instances towards politicians.
