Peace talks between Pakistan and Afghanistan, aimed at de-escalating tensions and preserving a fragile ceasefire, have collapsed in Istanbul. Hosted by Turkey, the negotiations ended without any significant breakthroughs, leaving the future of bilateral relations uncertain. Both Islamabad and Kabul are trading accusations for the failed diplomatic effort. The situation has been further inflamed by a direct threat from the Taliban, warning Pakistan of severe repercussions for any military actions along the Durand Line.
During the high-stakes discussions, Pakistan made a notable admission regarding its defense arrangements. According to Afghan news reports, Pakistan revealed it has an agreement with an unnamed foreign entity allowing for drone strikes within its territory. Pakistan conveyed that this treaty prevents it from obstructing such operations. This revelation occurs alongside Pakistan’s deepening defense ties with Saudi Arabia and its ongoing strategic cooperation with the United States.
Pakistan’s negotiators also strongly urged Afghanistan to acknowledge Islamabad’s ‘right to respond’ to attacks carried out by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). The Taliban, however, firmly believes the TTP issue is an internal Pakistani matter. They reiterated their commitment to ensuring that Afghan territory is not used as a launchpad for attacks against any country.
The Taliban has issued a strong warning of retaliation, stating that Pakistan would face consequences if it bombed Afghan territory. This declaration follows statements from Pakistan’s Defence Minister, who indicated the possibility of ‘open war’ as a recourse if peace talks were unsuccessful, while also noting the Taliban’s reported inclination towards peace.
Reports from the ground indicate that the talks are at a critical deadlock, with persistent blame-shifting. Pakistani officials have reportedly expressed disappointment over Kabul’s alleged unwillingness to accept their ‘logical and legitimate’ national security demands. Meanwhile, the Taliban delegation reportedly described the Pakistani negotiators as ‘disorganized’ and ‘uncooperative,’ citing instances where they allegedly left the negotiation table, suggesting a lack of internal consensus.