MUMBAI : The Shiv Sena, through its mouthpiece 'Saamana', attacked the 'Babri Prem' shown by Owaisi on the occasion of the grand ground worship of the Sri Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. Shiv Sena said that 'Babar is not alive in Hindusthan, now somewhere in the whole world. The construction of Shri Ram temple in Ayodhya has now become a reality. This is the victory of public sentiments Mr. Owaisi, now stop crying and so on '. Shiv Sena warned Pakistan to stop nosing in this matter. First of all, he removed the Islamic Republic in his constitution and added the word secular, then talk to us.
The latest article published in Saamana titled 'Owaisi Ki Bang does not welcome the Muslims of the country' says that the construction work of the grand-divine Ram temple has begun in Ayodhya. Prime Minister Modi saw Shri Ram after prostrating. Modi said that Ram Janmabhoomi has been freed from the cycle of crisis. All the leaders including Rahul and Priyanka have welcomed it. But obstetrician Asaduddin Owaisi says that Babur is alive and will be alive. The other Muslim brothers of this country of Owaisi do not welcome.
'Babur is not alive even now in Hindustan, even in Uzbekistan'
Saamana asked Owaisi who is Babur. What does that think of you Babur said that Hindusthan is not alive anywhere in the whole world. The Uzbekistan from which he came, how alive is he in that country? Babur was an invader entering Hindusthan. Hindus do not cease to exist for a period of time. Babur destroyed the Ram Janmabhoomi and built a mosque there. Why do leaders like Owaisi not accept this?
"How secular, Owaisi should introspect himself" Saamana
said that Owaisi speaks that Hindusthan is a secular nation. Therefore, Modi has broken the constitutional oath by appearing in the Bhoomi Poojan program of Ram temple. But how secular is Owaisi himself. They should introspect Owaisi has called the Bhoomi Pujan of Ayodhya a victory for Hindutva. We say, this is the victory of justice and truth. Which is legally found under the constitution. Hinduism does not have its own Sharia nor does it consider other religions to be infidels. Ram temple is the national symbol of this constitution.
'Former PM Narasimha Rao raised the question on secularism'
praising former Prime Minister Narasimha Rao said that in April 1992 Narasimha Rao gave his views on secularism. He had said that some party is secular. How to prove it Sitting in front of the Imam in Jama Masjid, talking about the political advantages and disadvantages, the secularists and those who build the Ram temple in Ayodhya are not secular, believing that it is a pretense of secularism. The hypocrisy was buried in the ground on 6 December 1992 forever.
'This is the victory of public sentiments Mr. Owaisi, now stop crying'
Attacking Owaisi, Saamana wrote that Asaduddin says I got emotional because a mosque had been standing at that place for 450 years. What Owaisi says is hypocritical because there was a Ram temple there for 4 thousand years. He was dropped from a cannon and a mosque was erected. So who should be emotional. The sin which was made with cannons. The Shiv Sainiks delivered him with their hammers. This is the victory of public sentiments Mr. Owaisi, now stop crying and so on.
'Pakistan does not need to be nosed in our case', while marking
Pakistan Railway Minister Sheikh Ahmed, Samna wrote that he says that India is no longer a secular country. He has now become 'Ramnagar'. Pakistan does not have to pierce its nose in this matter. Pakistan should first remove the word Islamic Republic from its constitution and declare it secular. Also, temples, gurudwaras and churches in Pakistan should be banned immediately. Hindus are being treated second to none. Hindu girls are being forcibly converted. In such a situation, there is no need for Pakistanis to open their mouths.