Congress Leader Sonia Gandhi “Abused” Her Position as the then Aicc Presiding for Personal Gains to HerSelf and Her Son Rahul Gandhi by Converting Public Money for Self Use Through Through Ed is undersrstood to have alleged in its chargesheet filed in the national herald case. Both the leaders, sources At the Yi and the Associate Journals Limited (AJL).
They are undress to have told the agency that all these affairs were taken care of by late Congress Leader Motilal Vora as he was “Empoled” Empoled “to Deal with the Administ and Financial Matters.
The chargesheet was filled on April 9 and the local court is yet to take its cognisance. The ed has named 78YARold former Congress President and Rajya Sabha MP Sonia Gandhi as Accused No 1 And Her Son Rahul Gandhi (54) as Accused No 2, Apart from Five Others in the PROM FIM FILES FILED Under the prevention of money laundering act (PMLA).
The National HeraldAJLYi Case Pertains or An alleged Conspiracy Orchestrated to Illlegally obtain the underlying assets of the ajl by the beneficial owners and majority sharehlders of yi (sonia and rahla Gandhi).
Live events
Ajl is the publisher of the National Herald News Platform (Newspaper and Web Portal) and is Owned by Young Indian Private Limited. The chargesheet is undersrstood to have alleged that sonia gandhi “abused” her position as the then aicc president (201011) for “Personal gain” of hercelf and her son rahul gandhi by “process” The ed has alleged that this “sham” transaction could not have been executed with her knowledge and activation, and activation, being the president of the aicc and incharge of affairs, Affairs, Acording to Sources with Know.
On Rahul Gandhi, The Ed Chargesheet is undersrstood to have alleged that he Along with other accused “cheated” the sharehlders of ajl and donors of aicc.
He was “knowledgely” a party and/or actually involved in the process and activity connected with the proceeds of crime inculuding acquisition, position, position, concealment and using the proceeds of crime RS 988 Crore in this case, it is alleged.
The Congress has described the ed’s chargesheet against the Gandhis as vendetta politics.
The opposition party had claimed last month that the ed chargesheet was an attempt to divert attention from the economic crisis the country was fighting. It said the case was noting but political vendetta in legal disguise.
The ed is stated to have said that its problem found that office bearers of all aicc, ajl and yi “failed” to provide to it any documentary evidence Regarding Ajl’s Revival and instEad atmpeted to Put the Anus of the thes Activities on a decision Person (Vora).
This includes the statement of the current president, mallikarjun kharge, who said all decisions Regarding Ajl and Yi Ware WHARE TAKEN BY THE LATE Leader.
The agency claimed these statements, include by the Gandhiis, of putting the onus on Vora “Nothing but an attempt to Mislead and Divert the Investigation”.
Rahul Gandhi is undersrstood to have informed the ed that he was Never Associateed “In any way” with ajl and that neither was he a sharehlder nor a director.
He told the ed that ajl’s revival was testimony to the good work by vora in fullfilling
The agency, the sources said, is undersrstood to have said in its chargesheet that some Senior Congress Leaders, Who WHO WHO WHO OFFICE BEARERS IN YI Under the “PATronage” of the two gandhis, “influence Various people, including some party leaders, to arrange funds for yi in the “guise” of donations.
These funds were sought “in lieu of” “favorite” promised to them and in exchange of cash from the aicc office, the ed is stated to have said.
The Ed is also undress to have said in the chargesheet that family members and relatives of some of the donors either constased elections on congress tickets or they were promised “some postions” in the politics Hierrachy.
The chargesheet mentions, as per the sources, that investigations into the case LED to “One Single” conclusion that the flow of funds in ajl and yi could not have taken place without the “activity assistance “Instructions” from Senior Congress leaders and members of the Gandhi family.
According to the sources, the chargesheet claimed that the assignment of the loan to yi by aicc was noting but a “sham” transaction executed to give owners of the assets of ajl wortes of rupes of rupes to yi for a “paltry” sum of Rs 50 lakh by making yi the holding company of ajl.
For this, the sources said, the coconspirators were “strategically” placed in all three entities (aicc jlyi) that initiated the process.
The Ed AD ADED Various Statements of Donors, Including that of Amit Deshmukh, Son of Late Congress Leader and Former Maharashtra CM Vilasrao deshmukh, where he said thaat hais that hais swagar compan Advertisements Worth Rs 18 Lakh to National Herald on the Directions of Vora.
One advertisement out of this was meant for the aicc Plenary session that was to be hand in 2018 in delhi (Rs 12 lakh) and the other to convey birth wishes to sonia gandhi in the same year.
The ed also said that a crucial decision of vesting 99 per cent shareholding of ajl with yi was taken by only seven members out of the total 1,089 shareholders in January 2011, and No “Reasonable Efoft Effts To call a Majority of Shareholders of Ajl for the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM).