Recent Comments

    Social menu is not set. You need to create menu and assign it to Social Menu on Menu Settings.


    1 min read

    Narendra Modi will lay the foundation stone of the new Parliament on 10 December. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla gave this information. According to the information, PM...

    2 min read

    The long-standing deadlock between the Central and State governments over the GST compensation amount has ended. All 28 states and three union territories with legislative assembly...

    1 min read

    Mulayam Singh Yadav, former Uttar Pradesh CM and founder and mentor of Samajwadi Party, reached the Khadi Ashram in Hazratganj late Friday. Suddenly on seeing Netaji,...

    2 min read

    Farmers are frozen on the Delhi border against the agricultural laws of the Center. At the same time, on this issue, Home Minister Amit Shah went...

    1 min read

     Apple announced that it was launching a new Replacement Program for affected iPhone 11 units. iPhone 11 units produced between September 2019 and May 2020 are eligible...

    December 5, 2020

    In CAA narrative, finding the judiciary’s lost voice

    2 min read

    Powered by iSpeech

    The recent enactment of the amendments to the Citizenship Act have left many, and certainly myself, very disturbed. The legislation itself is undoubtedly problematic and is compounded by the linkages with the Register of Citizens (NRC). I was a part of a People’s Tribunal on the deployment of the NRC in Assam, and we found that even though it was conducted under the aegis of the court, it was a disastrous exercise with terrifying consequences.

    The protests that have followed the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), 2019, were not surprising, but the manner in which the protesters were treated certainly is. The reaction of the law and order machinery to what were essentially student-led peaceful protests has led to incidents of violence and loss of property across the country, which is terribly unfortunate. This is a reflection of the times we live in and signals that the youth in our country have to spend the next significant amount of time battling a leadership that comes across, at once, as communal and authoritarian.

    Subdued judiciary

    At such times, empathy is but a natural reaction, particularly from a generation that has lived through and seen the worst of the authoritarian regime that was the Emergency. In this context, what I personally feel worse about is that the voice of the judiciary in this narrative is either almost entirely absent or has been overwhelmed by a strong executive.

    The CAA is touted as a “fast-track” means of granting citizenship by naturalisation to what it identifies as persecuted minorities (Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians) from three neighbouring countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan). Those belonging to these communities from these countries will not, as per the law, be regarded as “illegal immigrants”.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *