Rajdeep Sardesai is a punching bag who nearly everyone makes considerable use of. The Right, Left, Congress, Islamists – everyone will get to take a swing at Sardesai. Of course, many of the embarrassment brought about to Rajdeep comes from the ‘right wing’, however his capacity to infuriate nearly anyone in India is unparalleled. At the core of Sardesai’s journalism is the timeless need of asking silly questions again and again. Furthermore, the person cleverly frames his inquiries to create a pre-facto narrative; which suggests the individual responding to the query must unconsciously admit that there’s a drawback current, even when there may be none. And his behavior of doing so has as soon as once more resulted in him being lambasted brazenly.At the India Today Conclave, Rajdeep Sardesai was on the receiving finish of an unforgiving assault by the hands of Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan. Sardesai requested Khan how he noticed his id as an Indian Muslim and what it meant for him to be an Indian Muslim. Arif Mohammad Khan’s takedown of the journalist was nearly on the spot.The Kerala Governor mentioned, “We are celebrating the Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav. Our independence did not come for free. It was accompanied by the partition of the country, a bloody partition of the country. There was a lot of bad blood and violence between the communities then…I think the partition happened because of this imaginary Muslim question, because of this question over majority and minority.”Read extra: Arfa Khanum tried to venture PM Modi as anti-Muslim, former cabinet minister Arif Mohammad Khan ripped her asideHe added, “It is not only our Constitution that gives equal rights to people, but more than that our cultural heritage, the Indian civilisation, has no concept of discrimination on the basis of the religion, therefore to link the two, I find it preposterous.”Arif Mohammad Khan additionally remarked that even after 75 years of India’s independence, it’s unhappy that the media was nonetheless harping on divisive discourse as a substitute of discussing Sabka Saath Sabka Vikaas, Sabka Vishwas. He mentioned, “The British never considered India as a nation. They always considered it as a conglomeration of communities. But this constitution considered citizens as the constituent unit of India. Where is the question of communities now? Come to my village and ask a Muslim about what is this Muslim question. He will be perplexed. Because he is facing the same problems as those faced by peasants belonging to other communities. Just because someone in Hyderabad said there exists a Muslim question, we have taken it seriously.”Vikram Sampath’s Attack on Leftist Historians Steals the ShowSpeaking alongside Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, historian and acclaimed creator Vikram Sampath earned a lot adulation for very succinctly declaring all that was fallacious with Indian histography. Referring to the primary brush an Indian has with the historical past of their nation in textbooks, Sampath mentioned it’s offered nearly in “third person” as if it’s the historical past of another nation.”To denigrate your previous, to really feel a relentless sense of apologia, that’s been the bane of historiography as a result of sadly, even on the heights of the British Raj, you had area for nationalist historians – Jadunath Sarkar, Radha Kumud Mukherjee, RC Majumdar, VK Rajwade, Bhandarkar, CV Vaidya.”Sampath then mentioned, “Sadly, post-Independence, the Congress party unwittingly gave away that space of historiography to the stranglehold of Marxist historians and in a discipline like this which thrives on the multiplicity of views, discussion, and debate. It has distorted history and created several fault lines.” Quoting American historian Will Durant, Sampath mentioned the Islamic invasion of India was the “bloodiest chapter of human history”.He added, “We labour under this false assumption that talking about the truth will upset contemporary social issues, but dare I say that the edifice of national integrity or social cohesion cannot stand on the shaky and false foundations of whitewashed history.”Both the periods had been moderated by Rajdeep Sardesai, and he will need to have felt personally attacked since each Arif Mohammad Khan and Vikram Sampath spoke with such readability on points that Sardesai despises. How can Indian Muslims not really feel a way of insecurity beneath the Modi authorities, as propounded by Arif Mohammad Khan, Sardesai have to be considering. To high all of it, Vikram Sampath actually pulled the rug from proper beneath Sardesai’s ft in probably the most elegant method.