SC reserves verdict on pleas in opposition to jallikattu legal guidelines
2 min read
Express News Service
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved verdict on pleas difficult the amended legal guidelines that enable jallikattu and bullock cart races in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra. The pleas had been heard by a 5 choose bench of justices KM Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and CT Ravi Kumar.
The supreme court docket, in 2018, had referred the case to the five-judge bench to determine whether or not the folks of TN and Maharashtra may preserve jallikattu and bullock-cart races as their cultural proper and demand their safety beneath Article 29 (1) of the Constitution.
The bench had formulated 5 questions which had been to be determined by the structure bench one in all which was whether or not the 2017 jallikattu and bullock cart races legal guidelines of TN and Maharashtra subserved the target of “prevention” of cruelty to animals beneath the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1960. It has been argued by the petitioners that simply because a gaggle of residents say it’s a tradition, it can’t be stated so.
Senior Advocate Shyam Divan for the petitioners argued the principles which regulated jalkikattu are an “eyewash”. Defending the legislation, Tamil Nadu argued that the highest court docket can recommend modifications to the principles and commonplace of procedures (SOPs) however can not learn down the legislation permitting jallikattu.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved verdict on pleas difficult the amended legal guidelines that enable jallikattu and bullock cart races in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra. The pleas had been heard by a 5 choose bench of justices KM Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and CT Ravi Kumar.
The supreme court docket, in 2018, had referred the case to the five-judge bench to determine whether or not the folks of TN and Maharashtra may preserve jallikattu and bullock-cart races as their cultural proper and demand their safety beneath Article 29 (1) of the Constitution.
The bench had formulated 5 questions which had been to be determined by the structure bench one in all which was whether or not the 2017 jallikattu and bullock cart races legal guidelines of TN and Maharashtra subserved the target of “prevention” of cruelty to animals beneath the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1960. It has been argued by the petitioners that simply because a gaggle of residents say it’s a tradition, it can’t be stated so.
Senior Advocate Shyam Divan for the petitioners argued the principles which regulated jalkikattu are an “eyewash”. Defending the legislation, Tamil Nadu argued that the highest court docket can recommend modifications to the principles and commonplace of procedures (SOPs) however can not learn down the legislation permitting jallikattu.
